906 words · 4 min read
Glacier CapitalEssays
Home/Essays/VOLUME I · PHILOSOPHY/NO. 7
VOLUME I · PHILOSOPHY · ENTROPY REDUCTION · NO. 10 · STAND AGAINST ENTROPY

Order Does Not Appear on Its Own

Rising entropy is the default state. Gathering scattered facts into a conclusion you can act on — that force is itself value creation.

Zhang Jiakang (JK) · Founding Partner, Glacier Capitalapprox. 562 words · 3 min readArchived 2026-08-16

Founders often ask us: same material, so why does it move when you handle it?

Let me put the view first. Because what we hand over is not a list. It is an order. Why? Two layers below.

Physics has a word for it: entropy. Left alone, everything drifts towards disorder. The financing table is the same. The founder holds the technology piece, the institutions hold the market piece, the existing shareholders hold the history piece. Nobody is lying, and nobody can assemble the whole picture. It goes that way by itself.

So where does order come from? Reducing entropy means gathering scattered facts into a conclusion you can act on. Deep thinking plus precise execution is the force that injects that order. The force itself is value creation, not a by-product.

Layer one: set the table the same for everyone

The strategic investor wants one condition, the financial investor wants another, the existing shareholders want a third. Each is reasonable on its own. But with everyone naming their own terms, sixty days of work turns into ten months. Our method is plain: set the rules first, write them on paper, the same for everyone; whoever comes in early gets the small advantage he is due. On this we do not bend. A fair deal environment is an accelerator. Will someone be unhappy? Yes. But he knows on what basis.

Layer two: get someone to fire the first shot

In investing, safety comes first and odds come after. When nobody has named a price, the table is at maximum entropy: everyone waits, and whoever moves first carries the cost of a wrong price alone. Once a credible price lands, the disorder drops a level — the question turns from "is it worth it" to "can I get in". So reducing entropy has one key move: find the person willing to set the price and hold it. He speaks, and the table arranges itself. That is the key.

Order has a time layer too. Sixty days, eight milestones: from D01, building the fact base, to D18, calibrating market expectations, takes eighteen days, under three-tenths of the run. Yet most of the questions challenged again and again later come out of those eighteen days. Reduce entropy before launch and changing one page costs roughly nothing. Leave it to surface at D35, deep due diligence support, and what you change is not a page but the whole timetable.

Reducing entropy is not a one-off either. Does subtraction have an end? Our answer: there is always more room. Why? Because we take twenty to thirty mandates a year, half new and half repeat mandates — every mandate taken and every colleague added brings the addition back automatically. So far there is only one measure: can half the steps be deleted again and the closing still happen. We ask that one every year.

Glacier's founding intent is to contribute to and refine the philosophical system of the boutique investment bank. Choosing the North Slope follows the same logic. Going with entropy is downhill and easy; going against it takes force at every step. We have run that account many times. The North Slope is harder to climb, but it is never crowded.

So when people ask what Glacier actually does, sometimes I answer with one line: order does not appear on its own. That is our work.